In re Price

Ohio Supreme Court

In re Price

797 N.E.2d 976, 100 Ohio St. 3d 204

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided November 5, 2003·No. Nos. 2002-0777 and 2002-0825·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the juvenile court for further proceedings consistent with In re Thomas, 100 Ohio St.3d 89, 2003-Ohio-5162, 796 N.E.2d 908.

Robin N. Piper, Butler County Prosecuting Attorney, and Michael D. Baker, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee state of Ohio. David H. Bodiker, State Public Defender, and Molly J. McAnespie, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant David Price. Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur. Lundberg Stratton, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the juvenile court for further proceedings consistent with In re Thomas, 100 Ohio St.3d 89, 2003-Ohio-5162, 796 N.E.2d 908.

Robin N. Piper, Butler County Prosecuting Attorney, and Michael D. Baker, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee state of Ohio. David H. Bodiker, State Public Defender, and Molly J. McAnespie, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant David Price. Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur. Lundberg Stratton, J., dissents.

In re Price, 797 N.E.2d 976, 100 Ohio St. 3d 204 (Ohio 2003).

Pincite

797 N.E.2d 976 (In re Price) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related