In re Price

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Price

228 A.D. 886

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Price. Read the opinion of the Court — 226 A.D. 460 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1930·Published

Opinion

Motion by respondent to reopen the proceeding granted and certain additional documentary evidence received. After reconsideration of the matter upon the record so amended and supplemented, an order of disbarment is entered in the same form as that entered June 27, 1929. The respondent’s motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals is granted. Present — Sears, P. J., Crouch, Taylor, Edgcomb and Thompson, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion by respondent to reopen the proceeding granted and certain additional documentary evidence received. After reconsideration of the matter upon the record so amended and supplemented, an order of disbarment is entered in the same form as that entered June 27, 1929. The respondent’s motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals is granted. Present — Sears, P. J., Crouch, Taylor, Edgcomb and Thompson, JJ.

In re Price, 228 A.D. 886 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

228 A.D. 886 (In re Price) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.