In re Price
This text of 19 F. Cas. 1316 (In re Price) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Held, facts not proved. Since the decision of the supreme court in Wilso-n v. City Bank, 17 Wall [S4 U. S.] 473, a judgment obtained by the orderly proceedings of a court cannot be impeached or set aside on the ground that the creditor, when the suit was brought, had reasonable cause to believe his debtor did something to aid him in procuring his judgment, — of which the proof seems to fail in this case, — he is entitled to the advantage which his diligence has given him over other less vigilant creditors. The motion to expunge must be denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
19 F. Cas. 1316, 1 N.J. Law J. 228, 1878 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-price-circtdnj-1878.