In re Price

19 F. Cas. 1316, 1 N.J. Law J. 228, 1878 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20

This text of 19 F. Cas. 1316 (In re Price) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Price, 19 F. Cas. 1316, 1 N.J. Law J. 228, 1878 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20 (circtdnj 1878).

Opinion

NIXON, District Judge.

Held, facts not proved. Since the decision of the supreme court in Wilso-n v. City Bank, 17 Wall [S4 U. S.] 473, a judgment obtained by the orderly proceedings of a court cannot be impeached or set aside on the ground that the creditor, when the suit was brought, had reasonable cause to believe his debtor did something to aid him in procuring his judgment, — of which the proof seems to fail in this case, — he is entitled to the advantage which his diligence has given him over other less vigilant creditors. The motion to expunge must be denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 F. Cas. 1316, 1 N.J. Law J. 228, 1878 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-price-circtdnj-1878.