In re Press-Post Printing Co.

S.D. Ohio

In re Press-Post Printing Co.

134 F. 998, 14 Ohio F. Dec. 670, 1901 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio

DecidedJanuary 11, 1901

DocketNo. 111

StatusPublished

This text of 134 F. 998 (In re Press-Post Printing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Ohio primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Press-Post Printing Co., 134 F. 998, 14 Ohio F. Dec. 670, 1901 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4 (S.D. Ohio 1901).

Pincite

Opinion

THOMPSON, District Judge.

Under the conditional sales referred to in the certificate of the referee, the possession of the property was transferred to the vendee, to be used in carrying on its business. The possession and use of the property were evidence of ownership, and, no doubt, helped the vendee to .obtain credit in its business dealings. And the creditors of the vendee who seized the property under legal process are protected against the title of the vendors, unless the vendors have complied with the requirements of sections 4155 (2) and 4155 (3) of the Revised Statutes of Ohio, declaring conditional sales of personal property void as to all subsequent purchasers and mortgagees in good faith and creditors, unless the condition be evidenced by a writing deposited with the township clerk, etc. The adjudication of this court that the vendee was bankrupt, and the transfer of the possession of the property to the trustee, constituted legal process, and operated as a seizure of the property for all the creditors. It wa,s, so to speak, an equitable execution in favor of all the creditors, including the vendors. The vendors are creditors of the bankrupt for the balanc'e of the purchase money. In fact, if not in legal effect, the vendors held the title to the property as security for the purchase money; and this security was available- against the vendee, and could have been made available against third parties by a compliance with the statute, or by the resumption of the possession of the property before it was seized by the creditors under legal process. I agree with the construction of sections 57a and 70a of the bankrupt act of July 1, 1898, c. 541, 30 Stat. 560, 565 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, pp. 3443, 3451], given by the court in Re Eegg et al., 96 Fed. 326.

The findings and order of the referee will be approved and confirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THOMPSON, District Judge.

Under the conditional sales referred to in the certificate of the referee, the possession of the property was transferred to the vendee, to be used in carrying on its business. The possession and use of the property were evidence of ownership, and, no doubt, helped the vendee to .obtain credit in its business dealings. And the creditors of the vendee who seized the property under legal process are protected against the title of the vendors, unless the vendors have complied with the requirements of sections 4155 (2) and 4155 (3) of the Revised Statutes of Ohio, declaring conditional sales of personal property void as to all subsequent purchasers and mortgagees in good faith and creditors, unless the condition be evidenced by a writing deposited with the township clerk, etc. The adjudication of this court that the vendee was bankrupt, and the transfer of the possession of the property to the trustee, constituted legal process, and operated as a seizure of the property for all the creditors. It wa,s, so to speak, an equitable execution in favor of all the creditors, including the vendors. The vendors are creditors of the bankrupt for the balanc'e of the purchase money. In fact, if not in legal effect, the vendors held the title to the property as security for the purchase money; and this security was available- against the vendee, and could have been made available against third parties by a compliance with the statute, or by the resumption of the possession of the property before it was seized by the creditors under legal process. I agree with the construction of sections 57a and 70a of the bankrupt act of July 1, 1898, c. 541, 30 Stat. 560, 565 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, pp. 3443, 3451], given by the court in Re Eegg et al., 96 Fed. 326.

The findings and order of the referee will be approved and confirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

134 F. 998, 14 Ohio F. Dec. 670, 1901 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-press-post-printing-co-ohsd-1901.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack