In re: Prescod
This text of In re: Prescod (In re: Prescod) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1904
In Re: WILLIAM ALFRED PRESCOD, JR.,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (5:09-cr-000029-RLV-1)
Submitted: December 16, 2010 Decided: December 22, 2010
Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Alfred Prescod, Jr., Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
William Alfred Prescod, Jr., petitions for a writ of
mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting
on his pending motions. He seeks an order from this court
directing the district court to act. Our review of the district
court’s docket reveals that the district court denied Prescod’s
motions on October 18, 2010. Accordingly, because the district
court has recently decided Prescod’s case, we deny the mandamus
petition as moot. We also deny Prescod’s motion for appointment
of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
PETITION DENIED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In re: Prescod, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-prescod-ca4-2010.