In re Prendergast

651 S.E.2d 605, 375 S.C. 188, 2007 S.C. LEXIS 344
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedSeptember 21, 2007
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 651 S.E.2d 605 (In re Prendergast) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Prendergast, 651 S.E.2d 605, 375 S.C. 188, 2007 S.C. LEXIS 344 (S.C. 2007).

Opinion

ORDER

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel has filed a petition asking this Court to place respondent on interim suspension pursuant to Rule 17(b) and (c), RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR, and seeking the appointment of an attorney to protect respondent’s clients’ interests pursuant to Rule 31, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR.

IT IS ORDERED that respondent’s license to practice law in this state is suspended until further order of the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that V. Brian Bevon, Esquire, is hereby appointed to assume responsibility for respondent’s client files, trust aceount(s), escrow account(s), operating account(s), and any other law office account(s) respondent may maintain. Mr. Bevon shall take action as required by Rule 31, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR, to protect the interests of respondent’s clients. Mr. Bevon may make disbursements from respondent’s trust account(s), escrow account(s), operating account(s), and any other law office account(s) respondent may maintain that are necessary to effectuate this appointment.

This Order, when served on any bank or other financial institution maintaining trust, escrow and/or operating accounts of respondent, shall serve as an injunction to prevent respondent from making withdrawals from the account(s) and shall further serve as notice to the bank or other financial institution that V. Brian Bevon, Esquire, has been duly appointed by this Court.

Finally, this Order, when served on any office of the United States Postal Service, shall serve as notice that Y. Brian Bevon, Esquire, has been duly appointed by this Court and has the authority to receive respondent’s mail and the authority to direct that respondent’s mail be delivered to Mr. Bevon’s office.

[189]*189This appointment shall be for a period of no longer than nine months unless request is made to this Court for an extension.

s/ Jean H. Toal, C.J.

FOR THE COURT

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Prendergast
702 S.E.2d 364 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
651 S.E.2d 605, 375 S.C. 188, 2007 S.C. LEXIS 344, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-prendergast-sc-2007.