In Re Prazoff
This text of In Re Prazoff (In Re Prazoff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
2008-1069 (Reexamination Nos. 90/006,327, 90/006,328 and 90/006,344)
IN RE MICHAEL PRAZOFF
Edward D. Manzo, Cook, Alex, McFarron, Manzo, Cummings & Mehler, Ltd., of Chicago, Illinois, argued for appellant.
Raymond T. Chen, Associate Solicitor, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Arlington, Virginia, argued for the Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office. With him on the brief were Stephen Walsh, Acting Solicitor, and Robert L. McManus, Associate Solicitor.
Appealed from: United States Patent and Trademark Office Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
2008-1069 (Reexamination Nos. 90/006,327, 90/006,328 and 90/006,344)
Judgment ON APPEAL from the United States Patent and Trademark Office Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences
In CASE NO(S). 90/006,327, 90/006,328 and 90/006,344.
This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
Per Curiam: (MAYER, RADER and BRYSON, Circuit Judges):
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
DATE: June 5, 2008 _ /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re Prazoff, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-prazoff-cafc-2008.