In re Power
This text of 281 F. 431 (In re Power) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This appeal is from the decision of the Commissioner of Patents, denying a patent for an invention on the ground that a machine embodying the claim of the issue was sold by applicant more than two years prior to the date of filing his application for patent.
It conclusively appears that such a sale was made. This bars applicant’s right to a patent, since the sale amounts to a dedication of the invention to public use. R. S. § 4886 (Comp. St. § 9430). Commenting on this provision of the statute, the court, in Smith & Griggs Manufacturing Co. v. Sprague, 123 U. S. 249, 237, 8 Sup. Ct. 122, 126 (31 L. Ed. 141), said:
“A single sale to another of such a machine as that shown to have been in use by the complainant more than two years prior to the date of his application would certainly have defeated his right to a patent.”
See, also, National Cash Register Co. v. American Cash Register Co. 178 Fed. 79, 101 C. C. A. 569; Mayer v. A. & H. G. Mutschler et al., 248 Fed. 911, 161 C. C. A. 29; Wendell et al. v. American Laundry Machinery Co. et al., 248 Fed. 698, 160 C. C. A. 598.
The decision of the Commissioner is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
281 F. 431, 52 App. D.C. 71, 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 2097, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-power-cadc-1922.