In re Poveromo

790 A.2d 901, 170 N.J. 627, 2002 N.J. LEXIS 534
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Poveromo. Read the opinion of the Court — 176 N.J. 507
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided February 27, 2002·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 00-356, concluding that JOSEPH E. POVEROMO of RIVER EDGE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1988, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect), RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.4(a) (failure to communicate with client), and RPC 8.1(b) (failure to cooperate with ethics authorities), and good cause appearing;

[628]*628It is ORDERED that JOSEPH E. POVEROMO is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Poveromo, 790 A.2d 901, 170 N.J. 627, 2002 N.J. LEXIS 534 (N.J. 2002).

790 A.2d 901 (In re Poveromo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.