In re Porro

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In re Porro

749 A.2d 432

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMarch 3, 2000

DocketNo. 566 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

StatusPublished

This text of 749 A.2d 432 (In re Porro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Porro, 749 A.2d 432 (Pa. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 3rd day of March, 2000, a Rule having been entered by this Court on January 28, 2000, pursuant to Rule 214(d)(1), Pa.R.D.E., directing Alfred A. Porro, Jr., to show cause why he should not be placed on temporary suspension and no response thereto having been filed, it is hereby

[433]*433ORDERED that the Rule is made absolute; Alfred A. Porro, Jr., is placed on temporary suspension and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa. R.D.E.; and the matter is referred to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 214(f)(1), Pa.R.D.E.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 3rd day of March, 2000, a Rule having been entered by this Court on January 28, 2000, pursuant to Rule 214(d)(1), Pa.R.D.E., directing Alfred A. Porro, Jr., to show cause why he should not be placed on temporary suspension and no response thereto having been filed, it is hereby

[433]*433ORDERED that the Rule is made absolute; Alfred A. Porro, Jr., is placed on temporary suspension and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa. R.D.E.; and the matter is referred to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 214(f)(1), Pa.R.D.E.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

749 A.2d 432, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-porro-pa-2000.