In re Popinoch

Ohio Supreme Court

In re Popinoch

104 Ohio St. (N.S.) 612

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 21, 1922

DocketNo. 17328

StatusPublished

This text of 104 Ohio St. (N.S.) 612 (In re Popinoch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Popinoch, 104 Ohio St. (N.S.) 612 (Ohio 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said court of appeals be, and the same is hereby, affirmed; for the reason that it clearly appears from the averments of the application for [613]*613a writ of habeas corpus itself that the conviction, commitment and restraint of the applicant were not only not in violation of bnt were in pursuance of due process of law.

Judgment affirmed.

Marshall, C. J., Johnson, Hough, Wanamaker, Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said court of appeals be, and the same is hereby, affirmed; for the reason that it clearly appears from the averments of the application for [613]*613a writ of habeas corpus itself that the conviction, commitment and restraint of the applicant were not only not in violation of bnt were in pursuance of due process of law.

Judgment affirmed.

Marshall, C. J., Johnson, Hough, Wanamaker, Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

104 Ohio St. (N.S.) 612, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-popinoch-ohio-1922.