In re Pope
This text of 2011 Ohio 4268 (In re Pope) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Cite as In re Pope, 2011-Ohio-4268.]
Court of Claims of Ohio Victims of Crime Division The Ohio Judicial Center 65 South Front Street, Fourth Floor Columbus, OH 43215 614.387.9860 or 1.800.824.8263 www.cco.state.oh.us
IN RE: JONATHAN T. POPE
CAROLYN A. POPE
Applicant
Case No. V2010-50884
Commissioners: Karl C. Kerschner, Presiding Susan G. Sheridan E. Joel Wesp
ORDER OF A THREE- COMMISSIONER PANEL
{1}On March 26, 2010, the applicant, Carolyn Pope, filed a compensation application as the result of the death of her son, Jonathan Pope. On May 26, 2010, the Attorney General issued a finding of fact and decision denying the applicant’s claim since her son’s death did not fall under one of the exceptions to the motor vehicle exclusion contained in the statute. On June 22, 2010, the applicant filed a request for reconsideration. On October 14, 2010, the Attorney General rendered a Final Decision reversing its initial decision based upon evidence provided by the applicant in the request for reconsideration. In the Final Decision the Attorney General agreed that the victim’s death was the result of criminally injurious conduct. The Attorney General’s investigation also revealed that the applicant received proceeds from a settlement of $100,000.00 from the offender’s insurance carrier. Pursuant to In re Thomas, V2005-74189tc (3-2-07), affirmed jud (6-29-07), attorney fees, litigations costs, and the first $50,000.00 were offset from the settlement pursuant to R.C. 2743.51(B)(9). After these offsets, the net settlement totaled $34,827.00. Based upon the holding in In re Fout-Craig, V93-27851tc (2-5-99), the Attorney General apportioned the net settlement Case No. V2010-50884 - 2 - ORDER
between economic and non-economic loss. The Attorney General determined the settlement should be apportioned 20/80 between economic and non-economic loss. Case No. V2010-50884 - 3 - ORDER
Therefore, $6,965.40 represents collateral source recovery while $27,861.60 constitutes non-economic loss. The applicant incurred unreimbursed out-of-pocket expenses in the amount of $8,211.53. When the collateral source is offset against this amount the applicant incurred an unreimbursed economic loss in the amount of $1,246.13. Accordingly, this amount was granted by the Attorney General to the applicant. On November 15, 2010, the applicant filed a notice of appeal from the October 14, 2010 Final Decision of the Attorney General. Hence, a hearing was held before this panel of commissioners on May 4, 2011 at 10:25 A.M. {2}Assistant Attorney General Heidi James appeared on behalf of the state of Ohio. The applicant did not attend the hearing. {3}The Attorney General made a brief statement for the panel’s consideration. The Attorney General outlined the reasoning used to determine what portion of the settlement constitutes a collateral source. The Attorney General recommended the applicant receive an additional award in the amount of $349.72, for a monument bench at Marion Memorial Cemetery. Additionally, the applicant incurred counseling expenses in the amount of $67.50. If the applicant incurs additional economic loss this would be the appropriate subject for a supplemental compensation application. Whereupon, the hearing was concluded. {4}From review of the case file and upon full and careful consideration of the statements presented by the Attorney General, we find the applicant should be granted an additional award of reparations in the amount of $417.22. Therefore, the Final Decision of the Attorney General is modified. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT {5}1) The October 14, 2010 decision of the Attorney General is MODIFIED to render judgment in favor of the applicant in the additional amount of $417.22; Case No. V2010-50884 - 4 - ORDER
{6}2) This claim is remanded to the Attorney General for payment of the award in accordance with this order; {7}3) This order is entered without prejudice to the applicant’s right to file a supplemental compensation application, within five years of this order, pursuant to R.C. 2743.68; {8}4) Costs are assumed by the court of claims victims of crime fund.
_______________________________________ KARL C. KERSCHNER Presiding Commissioner
_______________________________________ SUSAN G. SHERIDAN Commissioner
_______________________________________ E. JOEL WESP Commissioner
ID #I:\VICTIMS\2010\50884\V2010-50884 Pope.wpd\DRB-tad A copy of the foregoing was personally served upon the Attorney General and sent by regular mail to Ottawa County Prosecuting Attorney and to:
Filed 6-24-11 Jr. Vol. 2279, Pgs. 50-52 Sent to S.C. Reporter 8-23-11
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2011 Ohio 4268, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-pope-ohioctcl-2011.