In re Poorten

54 A.D.2d 506, 389 N.Y.S.2d 709, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14530

This text of 54 A.D.2d 506 (In re Poorten) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Poorten, 54 A.D.2d 506, 389 N.Y.S.2d 709, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14530 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to the Bar by this court on the second day of November, 1955 and has practiced law in this State since admission. Charges of unprofessional conduct were made against him, including failure to perform legal services for clients after receiving payment therefor, and misrepresenting to clients the status of their proceedings on which he was working.

Following the service of the petition on him, respondent admitted the allegations of the charges against him, and he has offered to resign from the Bar (see Matter of Gamier, 35 AD2d 182).

His resignation should be accepted and his name stricken from the roll of attorneys.

Marsh, P. J., Cardamone, Simons, Goldman and Witmer, JJ., concur.

Resignation accepted and name stricken from roll of attorneys.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Garnier
35 A.D.2d 182 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
54 A.D.2d 506, 389 N.Y.S.2d 709, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14530, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-poorten-nyappdiv-1976.