In Re Ponds

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

In Re Ponds

971 A.2d 909, 2009 D.C. App. LEXIS 171, 2009 WL 1321908

CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 14, 2009

Docket02-BG-659

StatusPublished

This text of 971 A.2d 909 (In Re Ponds) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Ponds, 971 A.2d 909, 2009 D.C. App. LEXIS 171, 2009 WL 1321908 (D.C. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the August 22, 2002, order of the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland disbarring respondent from practice before that court, this court’s September 3, 2002, order suspending respondent from practice in this jurisdiction pending final disposition by this court, the Report and Recommendation and Supplemental Report and Recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility, to which no exceptions have been taken, respondent’s motion and supplemental motion for nunc pro tunc treatment, Bar Counsel’s oppositions thereto, and respondent’s Amended Affidavit and Second Amended Affidavit in Compliance with D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g), it is

ORDERED that Navron Ponds is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the District of Columbia. See In re Libby, 945 A.2d 1169 (D.C.2008); In re Goffe, 641 A.2d 458 (D.C.1994). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that respondent’s motion and supplemental motion for nunc pro tunc treatment are denied and that for the purposes of reinstatement, respondent’s disbarment will run from February 24, 2009, the date that he filed his Second Amended Affidavit thereby bringing him into full compliance with the requirements of D.C.Bar. R. XI, § 14(g). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the matter based on respondent’s misdemeanor violations of 26 U.S.C. § 7203 is dismissed as moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the August 22, 2002, order of the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland disbarring respondent from practice before that court, this court’s September 3, 2002, order suspending respondent from practice in this jurisdiction pending final disposition by this court, the Report and Recommendation and Supplemental Report and Recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility, to which no exceptions have been taken, respondent’s motion and supplemental motion for nunc pro tunc treatment, Bar Counsel’s oppositions thereto, and respondent’s Amended Affidavit and Second Amended Affidavit in Compliance with D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g), it is

ORDERED that Navron Ponds is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the District of Columbia. See In re Libby, 945 A.2d 1169 (D.C.2008); In re Goffe, 641 A.2d 458 (D.C.1994). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that respondent’s motion and supplemental motion for nunc pro tunc treatment are denied and that for the purposes of reinstatement, respondent’s disbarment will run from February 24, 2009, the date that he filed his Second Amended Affidavit thereby bringing him into full compliance with the requirements of D.C.Bar. R. XI, § 14(g). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the matter based on respondent’s misdemeanor violations of 26 U.S.C. § 7203 is dismissed as moot.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

971 A.2d 909, 2009 D.C. App. LEXIS 171, 2009 WL 1321908, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ponds-dc-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack