In re Pomerance
231 A.D. 869
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 15, 1930
StatusPublished
This text of 231 A.D. 869 (In re Pomerance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
In re Pomerance, 231 A.D. 869 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).
Opinion
Application denied without prejudice to renewal after application to the Court of Appeals for suspension of rule II of Rules [of the Court of Appeals] for the Admission of Attorneys and Counselors-at-Law. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Hagarty and Carswell, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
231 A.D. 869, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-pomerance-nyappdiv-1930.