In re Pollack
234 A.D.2d 95, 667 N.Y.S.2d 243, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14015
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Pollack. Read the opinion of the Court — 238 A.D.2d 1 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 10, 1996·Published
Opinion
—Application for reinstatement as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York granted only insofar as to refer this matter to the Departmental Disciplinary Committee for a hearing as indicated. No opinion. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Rosenberger, Ellerin and Wallach, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Pollack, 234 A.D.2d 95, 667 N.Y.S.2d 243, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14015 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).
234 A.D.2d 95 (In re Pollack) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.