In re: Pollack

CourtHawaii Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 6, 2023
DocketSCPR-23-0000024
StatusPublished

This text of In re: Pollack (In re: Pollack) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re: Pollack, (haw 2023).

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPR-XX-XXXXXXX 06-FEB-2023 10:17 AM Dkt. 9 OGP

SCPR-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

IN RE LINDA GAIL SIDNEY POLLACK, Petitioner.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ORDER GRANTING PETITION TO RESIGN IN GOOD STANDING (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ.)

Upon consideration of the petition to resign from the

practice of law in the State of Hawai#i, filed by attorney Linda

Gail Sidney Pollack, pursuant to Rule 1.10 of the Rules of the

Supreme Court of the State of Hawai#i (RSCH), but to retain the

paper license as a memento, as authorized by RSCH Rule 1.10(b),

and the affidavits submitted in support thereof, and upon

consideration of the motion for a refund of the $165.00 filing

fee, filed the same day by Respondent Pollack, we conclude that

Petitioner Pollack has fully complied with the requirements of

RSCH Rule 1.10 but has failed to establish cause for the waiver

of the filing fee. Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition to resign is

granted nunc pro tunc to December 31, 2022. Petitioner Pollack

may retain the paper license as a memento. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to RSCH Rule 1.10(g),

that the Petitioner shall comply with the notice, affidavit, and

record requirements of RSCH Rules 2.16(a), (b), (d), and (g).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall remove the

name of Petitioner Pollack, attorney number 6213, from the roll

of attorneys of the State of Hawai#i, effective with the filing

of this order.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for waiver of the

filing fee is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, February 6, 2023.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

/s/ Todd W. Eddins

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
In re: Pollack, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-pollack-haw-2023.