In Re Polk

215 B.R. 250, 39 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 8, 11 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 130, 1997 Bankr. LEXIS 1979, 1997 WL 746978
CourtUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida
DecidedNovember 17, 1997
DocketBankruptcy 95-01633-BKC-3P7
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 215 B.R. 250 (In Re Polk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Polk, 215 B.R. 250, 39 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 8, 11 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 130, 1997 Bankr. LEXIS 1979, 1997 WL 746978 (Fla. 1997).

Opinion

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

GEORGE L. PROCTOR, Bankruptcy Judge.

This case came on for hearing on September 2, 1997, on the Objection to Application for Allowance of Attorney’s Fee for Attorney for Trustee and Application of Trustee for Compensation, filed by the United States Trustee. Based upon the evidence offered, the Court makes the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law:

FINDINGS OF FACT

1. Debtor filed this case under chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code on April 11, 1995. Alexander G. Smith was subsequently appointed the Chapter 7 trustee on April 20, 1995.

2. On May 22, 1995, this Court entered an order granting the trustee’s application to employ himself as the attorney for the trustee. Mr. Smith now seeks compensation for his services as trustee and as attorney for the trustee.

3. According to the Trustee’s Preliminary Report of Estate there is a balance of $3960.15 in the estate, and claims of general unsecured creditors total $37,158.29.

4. The trustee seeks the statutory maximum fee in this case of $990.04, plus expenses of $83.04.

5. The trustee seeks attorney fees in the amount of $560.00, representing 2.8 hours of service charged at a rate of $200.00 per hour. 1

6. The United States Trustee argues that the following entries of professional time in the trustee’s application for attorney fees are noncompensable as attorney time:

5/18/95 Preparation of Application to Appoint .30 Attorney and Order thereon
5/18/95 Preparation of Application to Appoint .30 Appraiser and Order thereon; correspondence to appraiser regarding appraisal of debtors’ personal property
6/08/95 Review file regarding claim of exemp- .40 tions and preparation of Objection to Exemptions
8/02/95 Preparation of Order on Trustee’s Ob- .50 jection to Debtors’ Claim of Exemption and correspondence to debtors’ attorney
4/18/96 Preparation of Motion for Turnover re- .30 garding 1995 tax return
6/04/96 Preparation of Notice of Withdrawal of .30 Motion for Turnover
6/05/96 Attend hearing on Trustee’s Motion for .30 Turnover to advise Court of withdrawal
2/02/97 Preparation of Application for Attor- .40 ne/s Fees

7. The United States Trustee objects to these entries on the grounds that the entries constitute trustee duties, and should therefore not be compensable as attorney time.

8. In the alternative, the United States-Trustee requests that the trustee’s fees be reduced if the Court finds the disputed tasks to be compensable as attorney time.

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

Pursuant to the Bankruptcy Code, a trustee may employ an attorney to assist the trustee in carrying out the trustee’s duties. 11 U.S.C. § 327(a) (1997). In addition, the Bankruptcy Code allows a court to authorize a trustee to act as the attorney for the estate. 11 U.S.C. § 327(d) (1997). The compensation of the trustee and the trustee’s attorney is governed by section 330(a), which provides that a “reasonable compensation for actual, necessary services rendered by the trustee, examiner, professional person, or attorney *253 _” will be awarded. 11 U.S.C. § 330(a)(1)(A) (1997). This “reasonable compensation” translates for the trustee into a statutory percentage of the sums disbursed or turned over in the ease. 11 U.S.C. § 326(a) (1997). However, if the trustee is also wearing the hat of the attorney for the trustee, the Bankruptcy Code provides compensation for the trustee’s services as an attorney “only to the extent that the trustee performed services as attorney ... for the estate and not for performance of any of the trustee’s duties that are generally performed by a trustee without the assistance of an attorney ... for the estate.” 11 U.S.C. § 328(b) (1997).

The Bankruptcy Code specifically provides that the trustee shall perform the following functions:

1. Collect and liquidate property of the estate;
2. Account for all property received;
3. Ensure the debtor’s compliance with 521(2)(B) (requiring statement of intent with respect to exemption redemption, or reaffirmation of property);
4. Investigate the debtor’s financial affairs;
5. Examine proofs of claim and object to improper claims;
6. If advisable, oppose the debtor’s discharge;
7. Furnish information concerning the estate as requested by parties in interest;
8. File periodic reports and summaries for the debtor, if an operating business;
9. Prepare a final report and file a final accounting of the administration of the estate with the court and the United States Trustee.

11 U.S.C. § 704 (1997). The statutory duties of the trustee are noncompensable as professional time if performed by the trustee’s attorney. In re Kuhn, 150 B.R. 825, 826 (Bankr.M.D.Fla.1993) (citing In re Shades of Beauty, Inc., 56 B.R. . 946, 949 (Bankr.E.D.N.Y.1986)). The purpose of the attorney for the trustee is not to provide assistance to the trustee in the performance of the trustee’s statutory duties, but to provide assistance with those services the trustee is unable to perform due to the lack of a license to practice law. In re Shades of Beauty, 56 B.R. 946, 949 (Bankr.E.D.N.Y.1986), aff'd, 95 B.R. 17 (E.D.N.Y.1988).

A difficulty arises when the court must distinguish between those duties required to be performed by the trustee and those duties, that necessitate the assistance of an attorney. The difficulty is compounded when the trustee and the attorney for the trustee-are the same individual. The bankruptcy court in In re Holub, 129 B.R. 293 (Bankr.M.D.Fla.1991) (Corcoran, J.), was called upon to determine whether services provided by the trustee’s attorney, who was also the trustee, were compensable as professional time.- The Holub decision limited the definition of “professional time” to:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Meredith Lynne Alexander
District of Columbia, 2022
Ronald Lee Gage
District of Columbia, 2022
In re Peterson
566 B.R. 179 (M.D. Tennessee, 2017)
In Re Lexington Hearth Lamp and Leisure, LLC
402 B.R. 135 (M.D. North Carolina, 2009)
In Re Virissimo
354 B.R. 284 (D. Nevada, 2006)
In Re Computer Learning Centers, Inc.
285 B.R. 191 (E.D. Virginia, 2002)
Harris v. Dublin (In Re U-Can Rent, Inc.)
262 B.R. 147 (M.D. Georgia, 2001)
In Re Howard Love Pipeline Supply Co.
253 B.R. 781 (E.D. Texas, 2000)
In Re Kusler
224 B.R. 180 (N.D. Oklahoma, 1998)
In Re Haggerty
215 B.R. 84 (M.D. Florida, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
215 B.R. 250, 39 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 8, 11 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 130, 1997 Bankr. LEXIS 1979, 1997 WL 746978, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-polk-flmb-1997.