In re Poley

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Poley

952 A.2d 1022, 196 N.J. 156

DecidedJuly 15, 2008

StatusPublished

This text of 952 A.2d 1022 (In re Poley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Poley, 952 A.2d 1022, 196 N.J. 156 (N.J. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 08-007, concluding that as a matter of final discipline pursuant to Rule 1:20-13, ANDREW K. POLEY of FAIR LAWN, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1999, should be suspended from practice for a period of three months and that the suspension should be suspended, based on respondent’s guilty plea in the Superior Court of New Jersey, to fourth-degree false swearing, in violation of N.J.S.A 2C:28-2a, conduct that violates RPC 8.4(b) (committing a criminal act that reflects adversely on the attorney’s honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer);

And the Court having determined from its review of the matter that respondent should be censured for his unethical conduct;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that ANDREW K. POLEY is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 08-007, concluding that as a matter of final discipline pursuant to Rule 1:20-13, ANDREW K. POLEY of FAIR LAWN, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1999, should be suspended from practice for a period of three months and that the suspension should be suspended, based on respondent’s guilty plea in the Superior Court of New Jersey, to fourth-degree false swearing, in violation of N.J.S.A 2C:28-2a, conduct that violates RPC 8.4(b) (committing a criminal act that reflects adversely on the attorney’s honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer);

And the Court having determined from its review of the matter that respondent should be censured for his unethical conduct;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that ANDREW K. POLEY is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

952 A.2d 1022, 196 N.J. 156, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-poley-nj-2008.