In re Pogarsky

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Pogarsky

688 A.2d 581, 147 N.J. 458, 1997 N.J. LEXIS 51

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided February 14, 1997·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board on December 4, 1996, having filed with the Court its decision concluding that GREG POGARSKY, formerly of LAKEWOOD, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1987, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.7 (conflict of interest), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that GREG POGARSKY is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

[459] ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board on December 4, 1996, having filed with the Court its decision concluding that GREG POGARSKY, formerly of LAKEWOOD, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1987, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.7 (conflict of interest), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that GREG POGARSKY is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

[459] ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

In re Pogarsky, 688 A.2d 581, 147 N.J. 458, 1997 N.J. LEXIS 51 (N.J. 1997).

Pincite

688 A.2d 581 (In re Pogarsky) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.