In re Poff
626 S.E.2d 887, 367 S.C. 615
This text of 626 S.E.2d 887 (In re Poff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
In re Poff, 626 S.E.2d 887, 367 S.C. 615 (S.C. 2006).
Opinion
ORDER
Respondent was suspended on December 12, 2005, for a period of sixty days. He has now filed an affidavit requesting reinstatement pursuant to Rule 32, of the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement contained in Rule 413, SCACR.
The request is granted and he is hereby reinstated to the practice of law in this state.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
626 S.E.2d 887, 367 S.C. 615, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-poff-sc-2006.