In re Poff

626 S.E.2d 887, 367 S.C. 615
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided February 14, 2006·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Respondent was suspended on December 12, 2005, for a period of sixty days. He has now filed an affidavit requesting reinstatement pursuant to Rule 32, of the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement contained in Rule 413, SCACR.

The request is granted and he is hereby reinstated to the practice of law in this state.

JEAN H. TOAL, CHIEF JUSTICE /s/ Daniel E. Shearouse Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Poff, 626 S.E.2d 887, 367 S.C. 615 (S.C. 2006).

626 S.E.2d 887 (In re Poff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.