In re Podell

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In re Podell

847 A.2d 655

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedFebruary 11, 2004

DocketNo. 115 DB 2003 (No. 44 RST 2003)

StatusPublished

This text of 847 A.2d 655 (In re Podell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Podell, 847 A.2d 655 (Pa. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 11th day of February, 2004, The Report and Recommendations of The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated December 19, 2003, are approved and IT IS ORDERED that DAVID MARK PODELL, who has been on inactive status, has never been suspended or disbarred, and has demonstrated that he has the moral qualifications, competency and learning in law required for admission to practice in the Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement shall be paid by the Petitioner.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 11th day of February, 2004, The Report and Recommendations of The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated December 19, 2003, are approved and IT IS ORDERED that DAVID MARK PODELL, who has been on inactive status, has never been suspended or disbarred, and has demonstrated that he has the moral qualifications, competency and learning in law required for admission to practice in the Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement shall be paid by the Petitioner.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

847 A.2d 655, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-podell-pa-2004.