In re Pocaro

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Pocaro

901 A.2d 906, 187 N.J. 410, 2006 N.J. LEXIS 1142

DecidedJuly 18, 2006

StatusPublished

This text of 901 A.2d 906 (In re Pocaro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Pocaro, 901 A.2d 906, 187 N.J. 410, 2006 N.J. LEXIS 1142 (N.J. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 01-036, concluding that JEFFREY R. POCARO of FANWOOD, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1982, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect), RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.4(a) (failure to communicate with client), and RPC 3.2 (failure to expedite litigation);

[411]*411And the Court having determined from its review of the record that a censure is the appropriate discipline for respondent’s unethical conduct;

And good cause appearing:

It is ORDERED that JEFFREY R. POCARO is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI