In re Pleasant Valley Society

93 N.Y.S. 1106, 105 A.D. 617
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 23, 1905·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

WILLIAMS, J.

The order should be reversed, and an order made appointing a referee to take the evidence of the parties and report the same to the court with his opinion thereon, with costs to abide event. The application was apparently made under section 27 of the general corporation law (being section 15, c. 563, p. 1063, Laws 1890, as amended by chapter 687, p. 1810, Laws 1892). The court assumed to hear and determine the matter upon affidavits. Many of the statements made in the affidavits were of conclusions, rather than simple facts, and we think the witnesses should be subjected to oral examination and cross-examination, and the whole evidence submitted to the court, before a final decision is made. The controversy seems to me to be of too much importance to be thus summarily disposed of. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Pleasant Valley Society, 93 N.Y.S. 1106, 105 A.D. 617 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).

93 N.Y.S. 1106 (In re Pleasant Valley Society) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Teperman v. Atcos Baths, Inc.
7 A.D.2d 854 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1959)
In re Silaski
175 A.D. 199 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1916)