In re Plaza

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In re Plaza

858 A.2d 610

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedSeptember 29, 2004

DocketNo. 819 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

StatusPublished

This text of 858 A.2d 610 (In re Plaza) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Plaza, 858 A.2d 610 (Pa. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT FROM INACTIVE STATUS

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 29th day of September, 2004, The Report and Recommendations of The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated August 24, 2004, are approved and IT IS ORDERED that EVA MARGARITA PLAZA, who has been on inactive status, has never been suspended or disbarred, and has demonstrated that she has the moral qualifications, competency and learning in law required for admission to practice in the Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the Bar of this Commonwealth.

Pursuant to Rule 218(e), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT FROM INACTIVE STATUS

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 29th day of September, 2004, The Report and Recommendations of The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated August 24, 2004, are approved and IT IS ORDERED that EVA MARGARITA PLAZA, who has been on inactive status, has never been suspended or disbarred, and has demonstrated that she has the moral qualifications, competency and learning in law required for admission to practice in the Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the Bar of this Commonwealth.

Pursuant to Rule 218(e), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

858 A.2d 610, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-plaza-pa-2004.