In re Plaut

Second Circuit

In re Plaut

172 F. 1023, 96 C.C.A. 666, 1908 U.S. App. LEXIS 4940

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedNovember 27, 1908

StatusPublished

This text of 172 F. 1023 (In re Plaut) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Plaut, 172 F. 1023, 96 C.C.A. 666, 1908 U.S. App. LEXIS 4940 (2d Cir. 1908).

Pincite

Opinion

PER OIJRIAM.

It is unnecessary to go into any of the points of law which have been raised on this motion. We are not prepared to hold that it was an improper exercise of the discretion of the District Judge to require the plaintiff to terminate his prior state court action, either by (rial or discontinuance, before proceeding to the trial of the second and later one, which he has brought on precisely the same cause of action.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER OIJRIAM.

It is unnecessary to go into any of the points of law which have been raised on this motion. We are not prepared to hold that it was an improper exercise of the discretion of the District Judge to require the plaintiff to terminate his prior state court action, either by (rial or discontinuance, before proceeding to the trial of the second and later one, which he has brought on precisely the same cause of action.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

172 F. 1023, 96 C.C.A. 666, 1908 U.S. App. LEXIS 4940, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-plaut-ca2-1908.