In re Platt

19 F. Cas. 815, 1 Ben. 534
District Court, S.D. New York·Decided November 15, 1867·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In this case a receiver, appointed under the national banking act, applied, on a petition setting forth the circumstances, for leave to compromise a debt. The national banking act, in the fiftieth section, provides that the receiver may compromise doubtful debts “on the order of a court of record of competent jurisdiction.” The question arose whether this court was a court of competent jurisdiction. The court, after consideration, decided that it had jurisdiction, and ordered the matter to be referred to a commissioner to take proof of the facts in the case, with his opinion thereon.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Platt, 19 F. Cas. 815, 1 Ben. 534 (S.D.N.Y. 1867).

19 F. Cas. 815 (In re Platt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hulse v. Argetsinger
18 F.2d 944 (Second Circuit, 1927)
Case v. Small
10 F. 722 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Louisiana, 1881)