In re Plate

New York County Courts

In re Plate

3 Liquor Tax Rep. 108

DecidedApril 15, 1903

StatusPublished

This text of 3 Liquor Tax Rep. 108 (In re Plate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York County Courts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Plate, 3 Liquor Tax Rep. 108 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1903).

Pincite

Opinion

F. E. Crane, C. J.:

As I read the testimony there are within the radius of two hundred feet of the entrances to the saloon, 135 Conover street, "nine buildings occupied exclusively as dwellings. They are 150 and 152 Conover street, rear which I count as one, 144, 146, 148, 150 front, 154 Conover street, 187, 169 King street and tenement in the rear of 137 Conover street.

The certificate holder obtained consents for only four of these dwellings, viz.: 150 and 152 Conover street, which he counted improperly as two, 150 front and 154 Conover street and 169 King-street. 152 Conover street, (front) which he included as a dwelling is used for business purposes. It is doubtful even whether the consent obtained from the owner of 154 Conover street is sufficient by reason of its acknowledgment.

As the requisite number of consents under the law have not been obtained, the application of petitioner is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

F. E. Crane, C. J.:

As I read the testimony there are within the radius of two hundred feet of the entrances to the saloon, 135 Conover street, "nine buildings occupied exclusively as dwellings. They are 150 and 152 Conover street, rear which I count as one, 144, 146, 148, 150 front, 154 Conover street, 187, 169 King street and tenement in the rear of 137 Conover street.

The certificate holder obtained consents for only four of these dwellings, viz.: 150 and 152 Conover street, which he counted improperly as two, 150 front and 154 Conover street and 169 King-street. 152 Conover street, (front) which he included as a dwelling is used for business purposes. It is doubtful even whether the consent obtained from the owner of 154 Conover street is sufficient by reason of its acknowledgment.

As the requisite number of consents under the law have not been obtained, the application of petitioner is granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 Liquor Tax Rep. 108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-plate-nycountyct-1903.