In re Pizzi
This text of 617 A.2d 663 (In re Pizzi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
The Advisory Committee on Judicial Conduct having filed a presentment recommending that FRANK A. PIZZI, JR., Judge of the New Providence Municipal Court, be publicly reprimanded for failing to inform a defendant that he was facing a charge of contempt of court, prejudging the merits of the defendant’s case, sentencing the defendant without taking a plea or hearing evidence, and for imposing a sentence that was beyond his authority, all in violation of Canons 1, 2 A, 3 A(1), 3 A(3), and 3 A(5) of the Code of Judicial Conduct and Rule 2:15 — 8(a)(6);
And respondent, by his counsel, having consented to the imposition of the discipline recommended by the Advisory Committee on Judicial Conduct and having waived his right to oral argument on an order to show cause;
And the Court having reviewed the entire record;
And good cause appearing;
It is ORDERED that the findings and recommendation of the Advisory Committee on Judicial Conduct are adopted, and FRANK A. PIZZI, JR., Judge of the New Providence Municipal Court, is hereby publicly reprimanded for his violations of Canons 1, 2 A, 3 A(1), 3 A(3), and 3 A(5) of the Code of Judicial Conduct and Rule 2:15-8(a)(6).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
617 A.2d 663, 130 N.J. 537, 1993 N.J. LEXIS 11, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-pizzi-nj-1993.