In Re Pittman

568 S.E.2d 608, 356 N.C. 163
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided August 15, 2002·No. 229P02·Published

Opinion

568 S.E.2d 608 (2002)
356 N.C. 163

In re Jakel PITTMAN, A Minor Child DOB: 10-03-99.

No. 229P02.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 15, 2002.

J. Richard Hamlett, II, Tarboro, for Lekeshia Harris.

*609 Jayne B. Norwood, for Nash Co. DSS.

Judith L. Kornegay, Rocky Mount, for Guardian ad Litem.

Francisco J. Bricio, Cary, for James Pittman.

Prior report: 149 N.C.App. 756, 561 S.E .2d 560.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Respondent (James Pittman) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 15th day of August 2002."

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Pittman, 568 S.E.2d 608, 356 N.C. 163 (N.C. 2002).

568 S.E.2d 608 (In Re Pittman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Pittman
561 S.E.2d 560 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2002)
Piedmont Triad Reg'l Water Auth. v. Lamb
568 S.E.2d 608 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2002)