In re Pitt

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Pitt

580 A.2d 1085, 121 N.J. 398, 1990 N.J. LEXIS 1383

DecidedOctober 23, 1990

StatusPublished

This text of 580 A.2d 1085 (In re Pitt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Pitt, 580 A.2d 1085, 121 N.J. 398, 1990 N.J. LEXIS 1383 (N.J. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed a report with the Court, recommending that HOWARD PITT of GREENWOOD [399]*399LAKE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1974, be publicly reprimanded for failing to maintain a bona fide office for the practice of law, in violation of Rule 1:21-1(a) and RPC 5.5(a) and for failing to cooperate with this ethics investigation, in violation of RPC 8.1, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the report and recommendation of the Disciplinary Review are adopted, and HOWARD PITT is hereby publicly reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it. is further

ORDERED that respondent shall reimburse the Ethics. Financial Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed a report with the Court, recommending that HOWARD PITT of GREENWOOD [399]*399LAKE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1974, be publicly reprimanded for failing to maintain a bona fide office for the practice of law, in violation of Rule 1:21-1(a) and RPC 5.5(a) and for failing to cooperate with this ethics investigation, in violation of RPC 8.1, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the report and recommendation of the Disciplinary Review are adopted, and HOWARD PITT is hereby publicly reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it. is further

ORDERED that respondent shall reimburse the Ethics. Financial Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

580 A.2d 1085, 121 N.J. 398, 1990 N.J. LEXIS 1383, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-pitt-nj-1990.