In re Piro
613 N.E.2d 201, 66 Ohio St. 3d 400, 1993 Ohio LEXIS 1204
Opinion
Having reviewed the record in this proceeding, we agree with the board that Piro has not established by clear and convincing evidence the necessary character and fitness for admission to the practice of law in Ohio. Gov. Bar R. I(11)(C)(6). Accordingly, his applications to register as a candidate for admission to the practice of law and to take the bar examination are disapproved. Piro may reapply to take the February 1994 bar examination and, upon reapplication, shall be subject to full review of his character and fitness.
Applications denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Piro, 613 N.E.2d 201, 66 Ohio St. 3d 400, 1993 Ohio LEXIS 1204 (Ohio 1993).
613 N.E.2d 201 (In re Piro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re VanDenBossche
88 Ohio St. 3d 158 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2000)
In re Application of VanDenBossche
2000 Ohio 290 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2000)
Piro v. Franklin Township
656 N.E.2d 1035 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1995)