Home/Ohio Supreme Court/In re Piro

In re Piro

613 N.E.2d 201, 66 Ohio St. 3d 400, 1993 Ohio LEXIS 1204
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJune 16, 1993
DocketNo. 93-443
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 613 N.E.2d 201 (In re Piro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Piro, 613 N.E.2d 201, 66 Ohio St. 3d 400, 1993 Ohio LEXIS 1204 (Ohio 1993).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Having reviewed the record in this proceeding, we agree with the board that Piro has not established by clear and convincing evidence the necessary character and fitness for admission to the practice of law in Ohio. Gov. Bar R. I(11)(C)(6). Accordingly, his applications to register as a candidate for admission to the practice of law and to take the bar examination are disapproved. Piro may reapply to take the February 1994 bar examination and, upon reapplication, shall be subject to full review of his character and fitness.

Applications denied.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re VanDenBossche
88 Ohio St. 3d 158 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2000)
In re Application of VanDenBossche
2000 Ohio 290 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2000)
Piro v. Franklin Township
656 N.E.2d 1035 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
613 N.E.2d 201, 66 Ohio St. 3d 400, 1993 Ohio LEXIS 1204, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-piro-ohio-1993.