in Re: Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.
Opinion
DENY and Opinion Filed February 11, 2020
S In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-19-01579-CV
IN RE PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES USA, INC., Relator
Original Proceeding from the 101st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. DC-19-05255
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Schenck, Reichek, and Evans Opinion by Justice Reichek Before the Court is relator’s petition for writ of mandamus in which it contends the trial
court abused its discretion by overruling privilege objections asserted in response to requests for production of documents and interrogatories; overruling over-breath, burden and relevance objections asserted in response to an interrogatory; and, compelling interrogatory answers and production of responsive documents. Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relators to show both that the trial court has clearly abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). After reviewing the petition and the mandamus record, we conclude relator has not shown it is entitled to the relief requested.
Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a)
(the court must deny the petition if the court determines relator is not entitled to the relief sought).
/Amanda L. Reichek/
AMANDA L. REICHEK
JUSTICE
191579F.P05
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re: Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. (in Re: Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.