in Re: Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided February 11, 2020·No. 05-19-01579-CV·Published

Opinion

DENY and Opinion Filed February 11, 2020

S In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-19-01579-CV

IN RE PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES USA, INC., Relator

Original Proceeding from the 101st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-19-05255

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Schenck, Reichek, and Evans Opinion by Justice Reichek Before the Court is relator’s petition for writ of mandamus in which it contends the trial

court abused its discretion by overruling privilege objections asserted in response to requests for production of documents and interrogatories; overruling over-breath, burden and relevance objections asserted in response to an interrogatory; and, compelling interrogatory answers and production of responsive documents. Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relators to show both that the trial court has clearly abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). After reviewing the petition and the mandamus record, we conclude relator has not shown it is entitled to the relief requested.

Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a)

(the court must deny the petition if the court determines relator is not entitled to the relief sought).

/Amanda L. Reichek/

AMANDA L. REICHEK

JUSTICE

191579F.P05

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re: Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2020).

in Re: Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. (in Re: Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of America
148 S.W.3d 124 (Texas Supreme Court, 2004)