in Re Pioneer Natural Resources Company and Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas

in Re Pioneer Natural Resources Company and Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.

DecidedSeptember 25, 2008

Docket14-08-00655-CV

StatusPublished

This text of in Re Pioneer Natural Resources Company and Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. (in Re Pioneer Natural Resources Company and Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

in Re Pioneer Natural Resources Company and Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed September 25, 2008

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed September 25, 2008.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-08-00655-CV

IN RE PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY and PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES USA, INC., Relators

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

On July 22, 2008, relators, Pioneer Natural Resources Company and Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc., filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov=t Code Ann '22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52.1. In their petition, relators request that we compel respondent, the Honorable Sharon McCally, presiding judge of the 334th District Court of Harris County, to vacate her July 3, 2008 order denying their motion for summary judgment on the issue of standing, grant the same, and dismiss the claims of real parties in interest, Mosh Holding, L.P., Dagger-Spine Hedgehog Corporation, and the Wiegand Group.

Relators have not established their entitlement to the extraordinary relief of a writ of mandamus. Accordingly, we deny relators= petition for writ of mandamus and also deny relators= related emergency motion to stay proceedings.

PER CURIAM

Petition Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed September 25, 2008.

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Anderson and Boyce.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed September 25, 2008

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed September 25, 2008.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-08-00655-CV

IN RE PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES COMPANY and PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES USA, INC., Relators

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

On July 22, 2008, relators, Pioneer Natural Resources Company and Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc., filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov=t Code Ann '22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52.1. In their petition, relators request that we compel respondent, the Honorable Sharon McCally, presiding judge of the 334th District Court of Harris County, to vacate her July 3, 2008 order denying their motion for summary judgment on the issue of standing, grant the same, and dismiss the claims of real parties in interest, Mosh Holding, L.P., Dagger-Spine Hedgehog Corporation, and the Wiegand Group.

Relators have not established their entitlement to the extraordinary relief of a writ of mandamus. Accordingly, we deny relators= petition for writ of mandamus and also deny relators= related emergency motion to stay proceedings.

PER CURIAM

Petition Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed September 25, 2008.

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Anderson and Boyce.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

in Re Pioneer Natural Resources Company and Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-pioneer-natural-resources-company-and-pionee-texapp-2008.