In re Pinsky

205 A.3d 183, 237 N.J. 332
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided April 11, 2019·No. M-822 September Term 2018; 082668·Published

Opinion

CONSENT ORDER

This matter having been duly presented on the application of Charles Centinaro, Director, Office of Attorney Ethics, and with the consent through his attorney-in-fact, of Morris W. Pinsky of Haddonfield, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1965, to transfer Morris W. Pinsky to disability inactive status pursuant to Rule 1:20-12;

And it having been agreed that respondent lacks the capacity to engage in the practice of law;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that Morris W. Pinsky is hereby transferred to disability inactive status, effective immediately, and until the further Order of the Court; and it is further

ORDERED that Morris W. Pinsky is hereby restrained from practicing law during the period that he remains on disability inactive status; and it is further

ORDERED that Morris W. Pinsky comply with Rule 1:20-20 governing incapacitated attorneys.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Pinsky, 205 A.3d 183, 237 N.J. 332 (N.J. 2019).

205 A.3d 183 (In re Pinsky) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.