In re Pierre L.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Pierre L.

265 A.D.2d 153, 696 N.Y.S.2d 411, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9689

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 5, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 265 A.D.2d 153 (In re Pierre L.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Pierre L., 265 A.D.2d 153, 696 N.Y.S.2d 411, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9689 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Alma Cordova, J.), entered September 29, 1998, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that he committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute robbery in the second degree, grand larceny in the fourth degree, criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree and attempted assault in the third degree, and placed him on probation for 18 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. We see no reason to disturb the court’s determinations concerning identification and credibility. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Williams, Wallach, Lerner and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Alma Cordova, J.), entered September 29, 1998, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that he committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute robbery in the second degree, grand larceny in the fourth degree, criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree and attempted assault in the third degree, and placed him on probation for 18 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. We see no reason to disturb the court’s determinations concerning identification and credibility. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Williams, Wallach, Lerner and Friedman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

265 A.D.2d 153, 696 N.Y.S.2d 411, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9689, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-pierre-l-nyappdiv-1999.