In re Pierre II.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Pierre II.

203 A.D.2d 817, 612 N.Y.S.2d 972

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 28, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 203 A.D.2d 817 (In re Pierre II.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Pierre II., 203 A.D.2d 817, 612 N.Y.S.2d 972 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from an order of the Family Court of St. Lawrence County (Nelson, J.), entered February 25, 1993, which, inter alia, granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, to extend the placement of respondents’ children with petitioner for 12 months.

The record reveals that the extension of placement of respondents’ children with petitioner for a period of 12 months was a proper exercise of Family Court’s discretion and in the best interests of the children. The court’s decision and order make clear that it complied with the mandates of Family Court Act § 1055 (b) (iv) (A) and (B). The remaining contentions raised in this appeal have been considered and rejected for lack of merit.

Cardona, P. J., White, Casey, Weiss and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from an order of the Family Court of St. Lawrence County (Nelson, J.), entered February 25, 1993, which, inter alia, granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, to extend the placement of respondents’ children with petitioner for 12 months.

The record reveals that the extension of placement of respondents’ children with petitioner for a period of 12 months was a proper exercise of Family Court’s discretion and in the best interests of the children. The court’s decision and order make clear that it complied with the mandates of Family Court Act § 1055 (b) (iv) (A) and (B). The remaining contentions raised in this appeal have been considered and rejected for lack of merit.

Cardona, P. J., White, Casey, Weiss and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

203 A.D.2d 817, 612 N.Y.S.2d 972, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-pierre-ii-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack