Home/D. Washington/In re Pierce

In re Pierce

102 F. 977, 1900 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 231
CourtDistrict Court, D. Washington
DecidedJuly 11, 1900
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 102 F. 977 (In re Pierce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Washington primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Pierce, 102 F. 977, 1900 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 231 (washd 1900).

Opinion

HANFORD, District Judge.

Upon consideration of the certifícale of K. D. McCully, referee, submitting the question: “Has the bankruptcy court any jurisdiction over the partnership estate? If so, to what extent?” — it is considered by the court that this court has complete jurisdiction of this case, and jurisdiction over the partnership estate of the late firm of D. W. Pierce & Son, provided possession of the assets can be obtained by the referee without forcibly interfering with property in the legal custody of an administrator. If the administrator will voluntarily surrender possession of the estate, the trustee may take it; but the trustee cannot take possession of any property of which the administrator has custody without his consent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Emanuel M. Virshup, Trustee in Bankruptcy of Teddy Kaye, Bankrupt v. Industrial Bank of Commerce
272 F.2d 43 (Second Circuit, 1959)
Crocker v. Kay
62 F.2d 391 (Ninth Circuit, 1932)
In re Von Ruden
22 F.2d 860 (D. Minnesota, 1927)
In re Salladay
22 F.2d 300 (E.D. Illinois, 1927)
In re Wells
298 F. 109 (S.D. Ohio, 1924)
In re Stringer
253 F. 352 (Second Circuit, 1918)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
102 F. 977, 1900 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 231, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-pierce-washd-1900.