In re Pierce

655 A.2d 438, 139 N.J. 433, 1995 N.J. LEXIS 233
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided March 24, 1995·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed a report with the Court, recommending that JAMES J. PIERCE of WHITING, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1971, be reprimanded on the basis of a conviction on a charge of lewdness in violation of N.J.S.A. 2C:14-4, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the report and recommendation of the Disciplinary Review Board are adopted and JAMES J. PIERCE is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Pierce, 655 A.2d 438, 139 N.J. 433, 1995 N.J. LEXIS 233 (N.J. 1995).

655 A.2d 438 (In re Pierce) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related