In re Pickle

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Pickle

618 So. 2d 395, 1993 La. LEXIS 1567, 1993 WL 138689

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedApril 23, 1993

DocketNo. 93-B-0589

StatusPublished

This text of 618 So. 2d 395 (In re Pickle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Pickle, 618 So. 2d 395, 1993 La. LEXIS 1567, 1993 WL 138689 (La. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of the record of the disciplinary board’s findings and recommendations, and the record filed herein, it is the decision of the court that the disciplinary board’s recommendations be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ordered that the name of Warren J. Pickle be stricken from the roll of attorneys and that his license to practice law in the state of Louisiana be revoked. Respondent is further ordered to make restitution to his client, Elaine Ger-kin, of the full amount of the consent judgment, $103,125.11, entered against respondent in the civil action brought by complainant. Respondent’s payment of full restitution or efforts to make restitution will be considered if respondent applies for reinstatement. All costs of this proceeding are assessed to respondent.

DISBARMENT ORDERED.

CALOGERO, C.J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of the record of the disciplinary board’s findings and recommendations, and the record filed herein, it is the decision of the court that the disciplinary board’s recommendations be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ordered that the name of Warren J. Pickle be stricken from the roll of attorneys and that his license to practice law in the state of Louisiana be revoked. Respondent is further ordered to make restitution to his client, Elaine Ger-kin, of the full amount of the consent judgment, $103,125.11, entered against respondent in the civil action brought by complainant. Respondent’s payment of full restitution or efforts to make restitution will be considered if respondent applies for reinstatement. All costs of this proceeding are assessed to respondent.

DISBARMENT ORDERED.

CALOGERO, C.J., not on panel.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

618 So. 2d 395, 1993 La. LEXIS 1567, 1993 WL 138689, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-pickle-la-1993.