In re Picciotti

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In re Picciotti

698 A.2d 569

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJuly 2, 1997

DocketNo. 325, Disciplinary Docket No. 3

StatusPublished

This text of 698 A.2d 569 (In re Picciotti) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Picciotti, 698 A.2d 569 (Pa. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 2nd day of July, 1997, a Rule having been entered by this Court on May 6, 1997, pursuant to Rule 214(d)(1), Pa. R.D.E., directing Anthony L.V. Picciotti to show cause why he should not be placed on temporary suspension and upon consideration of the responses filed, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Rule is made absolute; Anthony L.V. Picciotti is placed on temporary suspension and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa. R.D.E.; and the matter is referred to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 214(f)(1), Pa.R.D.E.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 2nd day of July, 1997, a Rule having been entered by this Court on May 6, 1997, pursuant to Rule 214(d)(1), Pa. R.D.E., directing Anthony L.V. Picciotti to show cause why he should not be placed on temporary suspension and upon consideration of the responses filed, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Rule is made absolute; Anthony L.V. Picciotti is placed on temporary suspension and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa. R.D.E.; and the matter is referred to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 214(f)(1), Pa.R.D.E.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

698 A.2d 569, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-picciotti-pa-1997.