in Re Phouthasack Phetvongkham
This text of in Re Phouthasack Phetvongkham (in Re Phouthasack Phetvongkham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-14-00254-CV
In re Phouthasack Phetvongkham
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM HARRIS COUNTY
M E M O R AN D U M O P I N I O N
Relator Phouthasack Phetvongkham petitions for a writ of mandamus directed to a
Harris County district court judge. However, Harris County is not within our territorial jurisdiction.
See Tex. Gov’t Code §§ 22.201(d) (listing twenty-four counties in Third Court of Appeals’s district),
22.221(b) (authorizing appellate court to issue writs of mandamus within its district).
The petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R.
App. P. 52.8(a).
__________________________________________
Jeff Rose, Justice
Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Pemberton and Rose
Filed: May 2, 2014
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Phouthasack Phetvongkham, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-phouthasack-phetvongkham-texapp-2014.