In Re Phipps Anderson Deacon LLP, Phipps Deacon Purnell PLLC, and Phipps Mayes PLLC v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re Phipps Anderson Deacon LLP, Phipps Deacon Purnell PLLC, and Phipps Mayes PLLC v. the State of Texas (In Re Phipps Anderson Deacon LLP, Phipps Deacon Purnell PLLC, and Phipps Mayes PLLC v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-24-00069-CV ___________________________
IN RE PHIPPS ANDERSON DEACON LLP, PHIPPS DEACON PURNELL PLLC, AND PHIPPS MAYES PLLC, Relators
Original Proceeding 48th District Court of Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 048-323196-21
Before Wallach, Birdwell, and Bassel, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion MEMORANDUM OPINION
The court has considered relators’ petition for writ of mandamus and motion
for emergency relief and is of the opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly,
relators’ petition for writ of mandamus and motion for emergency relief are denied.
Per Curiam
Delivered: February 20, 2024
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re Phipps Anderson Deacon LLP, Phipps Deacon Purnell PLLC, and Phipps Mayes PLLC v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-phipps-anderson-deacon-llp-phipps-deacon-purnell-pllc-and-phipps-texapp-2024.