in Re Phipps Anderson Deacon LLP, Phipps Deacon Purnell PLLC, and Phipps Mayes PLLC
This text of in Re Phipps Anderson Deacon LLP, Phipps Deacon Purnell PLLC, and Phipps Mayes PLLC (in Re Phipps Anderson Deacon LLP, Phipps Deacon Purnell PLLC, and Phipps Mayes PLLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-21-00440-CV ___________________________
IN RE PHIPPS ANDERSON DEACON LLP, PHIPPS DEACON PURNELL PLLC, AND PHIPPS MAYES PLLC, Relators
Original Proceeding 48th District Court of Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 048-323196-21
Before Kerr, Birdwell, and Walker, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion MEMORANDUM OPINION
The court has considered relators’ amended petition for writ of mandamus and
is of the opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, relators’ petition for writ
of mandamus is denied, and relators’ motion for extension of time to file amended
petition is denied as moot. We release our stay of January 4, 2022.
Per Curiam
Delivered: March 17, 2022
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Phipps Anderson Deacon LLP, Phipps Deacon Purnell PLLC, and Phipps Mayes PLLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-phipps-anderson-deacon-llp-phipps-deacon-purnell-pllc-and-phipps-texapp-2022.