In re Philpot

988 N.E.2d 263, 2013 WL 2445359, 2013 Ind. LEXIS 439
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedMay 30, 2013
DocketNo. 45S00-1304-DI-224
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 988 N.E.2d 263 (In re Philpot) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Philpot, 988 N.E.2d 263, 2013 WL 2445359, 2013 Ind. LEXIS 439 (Ind. 2013).

Opinion

PUBLISHED ORDER OF INTERIM SUSPENSION UPON NOTICE OF GUILTY FINDING

The Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission, pursuant to Indiana Admission and Discipline Rule 23(11.l)(a), has filed a “Notice of Guilty Finding and Request for Suspension,” asking that Respondent be suspended from the practice of law in this State, pending further order of this Court or final resolution of any resulting disciplinary action, due to Respondent be[264]*264ing found guilty of a crime punishable as a felony.

The Court, being duly advised and upon consideration of all materials submitted, now finds that on February 21, 2013, a judgment of guilty was entered against Respondent on jury verdicts of guilt on the following offenses under federal law: two counts of Mail Fraud and one count of Theft from a Federally Funded Program, all of which are felonies.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Respondent is suspended pendente lite from the practice of law in this State, effective fifteen (15) days from the date of this order. Respondent is ordered to fulfill the duties of a suspended attorney under Admission and Discipline Rule 23(26). The interim suspension shall continue until further order of this Court or final resolution of any resulting disciplinary action, provided no other suspension is in effect.

The Clerk of this Court is directed to send notice of this Order to Respondent or Respondent’s attorney by certified or registered mail, to the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission, and to all other entities entitled to notice under Admission and Discipline Rule 23(3)(d). The Clerk is further directed to post this order to the Court’s website, and Thomson Reuters is directed to publish a copy of this order in the bound volumes of this Court’s decisions.

All Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In the Matter of: Thomas R. Philpot
31 N.E.3d 468 (Indiana Supreme Court, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
988 N.E.2d 263, 2013 WL 2445359, 2013 Ind. LEXIS 439, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-philpot-ind-2013.