In re Phillips

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In re Phillips

801 A.2d 1208

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJune 19, 2002

DocketNo. 611 Disciplinary Docket No. 2

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 801 A.2d 1208 (In re Phillips) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Phillips, 801 A.2d 1208 (Pa. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 19th day of June, 2002, the Petition for Reinstatement is denied [1209]*1209and petitioner is forever barred from the practice of law in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. See Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Keller, 509 Pa. 573, 506 A.2d 872 (1986). Pursuant to Rule 218(e), Pa. R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.

Mr. Justice Castille did not participate in this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 19th day of June, 2002, the Petition for Reinstatement is denied [1209]*1209and petitioner is forever barred from the practice of law in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. See Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Keller, 509 Pa. 573, 506 A.2d 872 (1986). Pursuant to Rule 218(e), Pa. R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.

Mr. Justice Castille did not participate in this matter.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

801 A.2d 1208, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-phillips-pa-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack