In re Phillips

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Phillips

222 A.D.2d 592, 635 N.Y.S.2d 92, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12917

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 18, 1995

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 222 A.D.2d 592 (In re Phillips) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Phillips, 222 A.D.2d 592, 635 N.Y.S.2d 92, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12917 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

—Proceeding pursuant to Executive Law § 298 to review a determination of the Commissioner of the New York State Division of Human Rights, dated March 11, 1993, which, after a hearing, determined that the respondent did not discriminate against the complainant and dismissed the complaint.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

We find that the determination of the Commissioner of the New York State Division of Human Rights that the respondent New York Seven-Up Bottling Company, Inc. (hereinafter 7-Up) did not unlawfully discriminate against the complainant Stanley Phillips because of his HIV -seropositive status is supported by substantial evidence. "It is peculiarly within the domain of the Commissioner, who is presumed to have special expertise in the matter, to assess whether the facts and the law support a finding of unlawful discrimination” (Matter of Club Swamp Annex v White, 167 AD2d 400, 401; see, Matter of Manhattan & Bronx Surface Tr. Operating Auth. v New York State Exec. Dept., 220 AD2d 668). There is ample evidence, medical and otherwise, in the hearing record to support the Commissioner’s finding that the physical manifestations of the complainant’s disability rendered him physically "unable to perform the job duties of any available position” with 7-Up (see, Executive Law § 296 [1] [a]; Matter of Antonsen v Ward, 77 NY2d 506; Lawson v High Bar Wholesale Food Distribs., 217 AD2d 646). Accordingly, we decline to disturb the Commissioner’s findings. Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Sullivan and Hart, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Proceeding pursuant to Executive Law § 298 to review a determination of the Commissioner of the New York State Division of Human Rights, dated March 11, 1993, which, after a hearing, determined that the respondent did not discriminate against the complainant and dismissed the complaint.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

We find that the determination of the Commissioner of the New York State Division of Human Rights that the respondent New York Seven-Up Bottling Company, Inc. (hereinafter 7-Up) did not unlawfully discriminate against the complainant Stanley Phillips because of his HIV -seropositive status is supported by substantial evidence. "It is peculiarly within the domain of the Commissioner, who is presumed to have special expertise in the matter, to assess whether the facts and the law support a finding of unlawful discrimination” (Matter of Club Swamp Annex v White, 167 AD2d 400, 401; see, Matter of Manhattan & Bronx Surface Tr. Operating Auth. v New York State Exec. Dept., 220 AD2d 668). There is ample evidence, medical and otherwise, in the hearing record to support the Commissioner’s finding that the physical manifestations of the complainant’s disability rendered him physically "unable to perform the job duties of any available position” with 7-Up (see, Executive Law § 296 [1] [a]; Matter of Antonsen v Ward, 77 NY2d 506; Lawson v High Bar Wholesale Food Distribs., 217 AD2d 646). Accordingly, we decline to disturb the Commissioner’s findings. Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Sullivan and Hart, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

222 A.D.2d 592, 635 N.Y.S.2d 92, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12917, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-phillips-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack