In Re Phillips 66 Company v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re Phillips 66 Company v. the State of Texas (In Re Phillips 66 Company v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued December 5, 2024
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-24-00687-CV ——————————— IN RE PHILLIPS 66 COMPANY, Relator
Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator, Phillips 66 Company, filed a petition for a writ of mandamus
challenging the trial court’s “June 25, 2024 Order Granting [Real Party in Interest,
Raymend Scott’s] Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on [His] Exclusive
Remedy Defense[] and [i]ts June 25, 2024 Order Denying [Relator’s] Plea to the Jurisdiction and Motion to Abate.”1 In connection with its petition for writ of
mandamus, relator also filed an “Emergency Motion for Stay of Trial Court
Proceeding.”
We deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and motion for temporary
relief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). All other pending motions are dismissed as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Goodman, Landau, and Countiss.
1 The underlying case is Raymend Scott v. Phillips 66 Company, Cause No. 2022-79660, in the 190th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Beau A. Miller presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re Phillips 66 Company v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-phillips-66-company-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.