in Re Phillip D. Cunningham, Jr., Richard Stacey and Stacun, Inc. D/B/A Stacun Investigations

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: August 17, 2004
• Docket: 13-04-00389-CV
• Status: Published

Opinion

NUMBER 13-04-389-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

__________________________________________________________________

IN RE PHILLIP D. CUNNINGHAM, JR., RICHARD STACY

AND STACUN, INC. D/B/A STACUN INVESTIGATIONS

__________________________________________________________________

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus __________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Hinojosa, Rodriguez, and Wittig

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

         Relators, Phillip D. Cunningham, Jr., Richard Stacey & Stacun, Inc. d/b/a Stacun Investigations, filed a motion for temporary relief and petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause on July 28, 2004. On July 29, 2004, the Court granted the motion for temporary relief and requested a response from the real party in interest, Steve Chapman.

         The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus and the response, is of the opinion that relators have not shown themselves entitled to the relief sought and the petition for writ of mandamus should be denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8. Accordingly, the stay of the trial court’s order of June 30, 2004, requiring disclosure of the relators’ client(s) is hereby ordered LIFTED. The petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED.

                                                                                 PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed

this 17th day of August, 2004.