Home/New York Court of Appeals/In re Phillies

In re Phillies

187 N.E.2d 797, 12 N.Y.2d 876, 237 N.Y.S.2d 347, 1962 N.Y. LEXIS 829
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 31, 1962
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 187 N.E.2d 797 (In re Phillies) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Phillies, 187 N.E.2d 797, 12 N.Y.2d 876, 237 N.Y.S.2d 347, 1962 N.Y. LEXIS 829 (N.Y. 1962).

Opinion

Motion denied.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Burke and Foster. Judges Froessel and Van Voorhis concur in the following memorandum: We do not agree that grievous error [877]*877was committed by the learned Referee in securing a copy of the provisions of the New York City Police Department Eules and Procedures adopted pursuant to law (Public Officers Law, § 66-a). A trial or appellate court may take judicial notice of a rule or regulation of an executive department or officer of any city within the State (Civ. Prac. Act, § 344-a, subd. A, par. 4; Administrative Code of City of New York, § 982-8.0).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Mortel
2021 NY Slip Op 04498 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
Ball v. City of Syracuse
60 A.D.3d 1312 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
In Re Bogart
386 F. Supp. 126 (S.D. New York, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
187 N.E.2d 797, 12 N.Y.2d 876, 237 N.Y.S.2d 347, 1962 N.Y. LEXIS 829, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-phillies-ny-1962.